How the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 Could Have Stopped Tamil Nadu’s Land Heist Fiasco

Rajagopal, a 52-year-old farmer from Thiruchenthurai—a quaint village on the Cauvery River in Tamil Nadu’s Tiruchirappalli district—was over the moon after his daughter’s wedding. The celebrations were grand, but they came with a hefty loan he needed to settle. No big deal, right? He’d sell his 1.2-acre plot, a piece of land his family had owned for over 70 years, to cover the expenses. After months of searching, he found a buyer willing to pay his asking price. Life seemed full of hope—until it turned into a nightmare straight out of a Kafka novel.

On September 15, 2022, Rajagopal and his buyer marched to the Sub-Registrar’s office in Lalgudi, paperwork in hand, ready to seal the deal. But the sub-registrar dropped a bombshell: “You need a No Objection Certificate from the Waqf Board.” The Waqf Board? Rajagopal’s jaw must’ve hit the floor. What does the Waqf Board have to do with his land? He wasn’t Muslim, had never thought of donating his land to anyone, let alone a Waqf, and was counting on this sale to pay off his daughter’s wedding debts. “Must be a clerical error,” the buyer consoled, equally baffled. They turned to the village elders for clarity, only to uncover a scandal that would leave the entire village reeling.

Brace yourself: the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board had claimed ownership of the entire village—389.03 acres, including agricultural lands, homes, and the 1,500-year-old Sundareswarar Temple, a Chola-era Hindu shrine sacred to the 90% Hindu population. A blanket ban on property sales was in place, courtesy of a 2016 gazette notification issued under the AIADMK government. Rajagopal’s dreams of financial relief? Shattered. The village’s heritage? Under siege. And all because the Waqf Board decided it could play God with people’s lives and history.

A Village in Uproar: Hindus vs. Waqf Overreach

The villagers didn’t take this lying down. Protests erupted, with hundreds, backed by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), storming the Tiruchirappalli Collector’s office on September 18, 2022, demanding the claim be revoked. How could an entire village—90% Hindu, with land records (pattas) dating back decades—be claimed by the Waqf Board, including a temple with Chola inscriptions from 500 CE? Rajagopal told The Hindu on September 19, 2022, “My family has owned this land for over 70 years. How can the Waqf Board claim it without even consulting us?” Good question, Rajagopal—too bad the Waqf Board didn’t bother with answers.

The claim over the Sundareswarar Temple, a site of deep religious significance, was the final straw. This wasn’t just about land—it was an attack on Hindu heritage, a blatant example of the Hindu/Sanatan bashing your so-called “intellectuals” love to peddle while crying “India is fascist.” The VHP’s Alok Kumar didn’t mince words on September 20, 2022: “This is an attempt to encroach on Hindu religious sites under the guise of Waqf law.” The BJP’s K Annamalai accused the DMK government of “appeasing minorities at Hindu expense,” while the DMK’s Minister Gingee KS Masthan tried to downplay it as an “administrative issue.” Sure, administrative—like claiming a 1,500-year-old temple is suddenly Waqf property. Nothing to see here, folks!

Facing a firestorm, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board Chairman Abdul Rahman issued a statement on September 22, 2022, claiming they were “awaiting state government clarification” and denying communal intent: “Waqf properties can be used by Hindus with our approval.” How generous! On September 25, the Board backtracked, allowing registrations without an NOC, effectively pausing the claim. The DMK government, led by CM MK Stalin, ordered a review of the 2016 gazette notification. Revenue officials confirmed that land records showed private ownership, with only 2 acres historically linked to an unused mosque. But the damage was done—Thiruchenthurai had become a battleground for communal tensions and a symbol of Waqf overreach.

How Did This Absurdity Happen? Blame the Waqf Act’s Loopholes

Let’s unpack the audacity of this land grab. The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board exploited the “Waqf by user” provision (Section 40, Waqf Act, 1995), which allowed properties to be recognized as Waqf if they’d been used for Muslim religious or charitable purposes over time—even without a formal deed. The Board claimed parts of Thiruchenthurai had been used for such purposes, but where’s the proof? No Waqf deed, no donor records, no evidence of Muslim use—just a vague assertion that 389.03 acres, including a Hindu temple, magically belonged to them. The provision was applied so broadly it’s laughable, violating every principle of due diligence. Villagers weren’t consulted, and the 2016 gazette notification was issued without a public hearing, spitting on natural justice.

Then there’s the Waqf Board’s unchecked survey powers (Section 4, Waqf Act, 1995), which let them conduct surveys, update records, and claim properties without mandatory public consultation. In Thiruchenthurai, villagers were never informed or given a chance to contest the survey findings. The process was a black box—389.03 acres, including a sacred temple, were gazetted as Waqf without hearings or appeals. This unilateral power grab, enabled by Section 4, let the Board assert control over properties without evidence or community input, leaving Rajagopal and his neighbors high and dry.

The result? A blanket ban on property sales, crushing Rajagopal’s hopes of paying off his debts, and a communal firestorm as the claim over a Hindu temple was seen as an assault on Sanatan Dharma. If this isn’t the kind of Hindu/Sanatan bashing your “intellectuals” thrive on while screaming “fascist India,” I don’t know what is.

Waqf Amendment Bill 2025: Slamming the Door on Waqf Overreach

Enter the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, passed this week (April 2-4, 2025) after 26 hours of fiery debate in Parliament. This bill doesn’t mess around—it directly tackles the loopholes that let the Waqf Board run amok in Thiruchenthurai. Here’s how it shuts down this nonsense:

No More “Waqf by User” Nonsense: The bill axes the “Waqf by user” provision (Section 40). No more claiming properties based on vague “historical use” without a formal Waqf deed. In Thiruchenthurai, the Board had zero evidence—no deed, no records—to back their claim over 389.03 acres, including the temple. Under the new law, they’d be laughed out of court, protecting the village’s lands and sacred sites from baseless claims. Connect the dots to why #KagazNahinDikhaenge trends in India—“It’s my land, but I don’t have papers”? Not anymore, Waqf Board. Show the deed or get lost.
Collector, Not Kangaroo Courts: The bill scraps the Survey Commissioner role—a Waqf Board appointee with civil court powers who could claim properties at will—and replaces it with a collector, a government official above district collector rank. No more parallel courts running wild, as some critics rightly complained. In Thiruchenthurai, a collector would’ve investigated the Board’s claim, found no evidence, and likely ruled the land as private or government-owned (the temple falls under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department). This ensures due process, not Waqf Board whims.
Transparency Through a Centralized Portal: The bill introduces a centralized portal where Waqf properties must be listed with full details—dedicator, owner, boundaries, income, you name it. Boards have six months to comply, and if there’s a dispute, the land isn’t Waqf until the case is resolved. In Thiruchenthurai, the Board’s opaque 2016 survey would’ve been exposed on this portal, letting villagers challenge the claim early. The next six months might be messy—riots aren’t off the table as Waqf Boards scramble to justify their claims—but transparency will finally hold them accountable.
Ownership Matters, Finally: The bill mandates that only the legal owner can dedicate property as Waqf, tightening criteria to stop fraudulent claims. In Thiruchenthurai, the Board claimed 389.03 acres without proving the original dedicator owned it. Villagers like Rajagopal had pattas dating back decades, yet the Board’s claim overrode them without evidence. The 2025 bill forces the Board to prove legal ownership—a tall order with no documentation. This would’ve invalidated the claim, saving Rajagopal’s land and the village’s heritage.

The Thiruchenthurai saga isn’t just a local scandal—it’s a glaring exposé of Waqf Board overreach that’s been allowed to fester for far too long, trampling on people’s lives and sacred heritage like the Sundareswarar Temple. Rajagopal’s shattered dreams and a village’s stolen peace are the collateral damage of a system that let the Board play land-grab roulette with zero accountability. The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, finally puts a leash on this madness, demanding deeds, ownership proof, and transparency—no more “Waqf by user” fairy tales or shadowy surveys. But the real test lies ahead: will the Board clean up its act, or will the next six months just bring more chaos as they scramble to justify their claims on that shiny new portal? One thing’s clear—if the Waqf Board thinks it can keep claiming Hindu temples without a fight, they’ve got another thing coming. Game on.

Thanks for reading!!

If you found merit in the article, please subscribe to my blog as there are many such stories that I am planning to write in the coming days. I would want to get those stories to all my readers.