The Great Software Saturation of 2026

Every morning, tech headlines sound the same:

“AI writes 80% of enterprise code.”
“Junior developer roles vanish as agentic AI matures.”

If you’re a student or a mid-career professional looking at the sea of millions of software engineers, that anxiety is real. The software layer of the world is crowded, automated, and brutally competitive.

But while everyone is obsessing over software intelligence, they’re forgetting something far more fundamental:

Physics doesn’t scale like software.

And that’s where FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) and SoC (System-on-Chip) engineering quietly enters the picture.

If software is the mind of modern systems, FPGAs are the central nervous system. They are why autonomous cars react in microseconds, why radar systems don’t miss targets, and why AI data centers don’t melt under trillion-parameter workloads.

Yet despite sitting at the core of every “deep tech” revolution, FPGA development remains a ghost town—especially compared to the overcrowded cities of Python, JavaScript, and “AI wrappers.”

Who This Post Is For

This is for:

  • Students choosing between AI/software and core engineering
  • Software engineers feeling squeezed by saturation
  • Anyone curious about how AI actually works in the real world, not just on slides

My “Accidental” Discovery in 2015

Before 2015, I was a fairly standard software/IT engineer. Even back then, I sensed where things were heading and made a risky call: I quit my job and enrolled in a Master’s in Embedded Systems.

That’s where I first heard the word FPGA.

At first, it sounded like a retro sci-fi relic—something from an older era. Like most students, I assumed the future meant writing higher-level code, moving further and further away from the metal.

Then I saw my first dev board.

That’s when it clicked.

With an FPGA, you aren’t just telling a processor what to do.
You are building the processor itself.

You are wiring hardware using code—Verilog or VHDL—defining how electrons will flow, cycle by cycle.

That single realization changed everything.

Since then, I’ve watched software go through repeated hype and bust cycles: web, mobile, crypto, AI. Meanwhile, my supposedly “niche” FPGA work has only become more stable, more valuable, and more interesting.

After working across four countries and multiple sectors, I can say this comfortably:

Switching to FPGA engineering was the best career decision I ever made.

The 2026 Reality: Why FPGAs Are Everywhere

Look inside any serious, industry-defining technology today. You won’t find a generic CPU doing the heavy lifting.

You’ll find an FPGA.

1. AI Data Centers: Feeding the Beasts

The world talks nonstop about TPUs—and increasingly about experimental ideas like Optical TPUs (OTPUs). These compute engines are incredibly fast at matrix math, but they are also rigid.

They live or die by how fast data reaches them.

This is where FPGAs dominate.

FPGAs act as Smart NICs and real-time data processors:

  • Managing terabit-scale networking
  • Handling sharding, compression, and protocol offload
  • Ensuring TPUs are never idle waiting for data

If you want to work at the heart of the AI revolution, don’t just train models.
Build the infrastructure that makes AI physically possible.

2. Automotive Autonomy: The Latency War (Germany)

In Germany, the race toward Level-4 autonomy is no longer about “better models.” It’s about determinism.

When a car performs sensor fusion—combining data from lidar, radar, and multiple high-resolution cameras—it cannot wait for an operating system scheduler.

Milliseconds are too slow.

FPGAs deliver:

  • Deterministic latency
  • Hardware-level parallelism
  • Guaranteed response times

That’s the difference between braking in time and becoming a case study.

3. Semiconductor & Medical Giants (Netherlands)

ASML
Their EUV lithography machines are the most complex machines humanity has ever built. Inside them, FPGAs control mirrors with nanometer precision.

No FPGA engineers → no chips → no global tech industry.

Philips (Medical)
In real-time ultrasound and MRI, GPUs handle image reconstruction—but FPGAs sit right next to the sensors, processing raw signals with absolute reliability.

Miss a frame here, and it’s not a UX issue—it’s a diagnosis problem.

4. Aerospace & Defense: Where Software Isn’t Enough (the UK)

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
Earth-observation satellites rely on FPGAs for massive DSP workloads under extreme power and radiation constraints.

Defense
From AESA radars to missile guidance and electronic warfare systems, the “brain” is almost always an FPGA-based SoC.

This is real-time computing, where:

  • Failure is not an option
  • Latency is existential
  • Software abstraction simply breaks down

These are only some of the sectors I’ve personally interacted with. There are many more—telecom, finance (HFT), space, quantum control systems—where FPGAs quietly sit at the core.

FPGA vs AI Software: The Career Moat

So why is FPGA engineering comparatively safer and more resilient?

1. AI-Resistant Skills

AI is excellent at writing Python.

It is not good at:

  • Timing closure
  • Clock domain crossings
  • Floorplanning
  • Physical constraints

AI can hallucinate code.
It cannot hallucinate a working circuit.

2. Scarcity Premium

For every 500 applicants for a data science role, there are often fewer than five qualified senior FPGA engineers.

In 2026, that scarcity translates directly into:

  • Negotiation power
  • Job security
  • Long-term relevance

3. Global Mobility

Defense, medical, automotive, and semiconductor companies are critical infrastructure. That makes FPGA skills a kind of universal passport.

Silicon Valley.
Eindhoven.
Munich.
Bangalore.

The demand profile barely changes.

The Myth of the “Impossible” Learning Curve

Yes, FPGA development is different.

Software is sequential: Step A, then Step B.
Hardware is parallel: everything happens at once.

That scares people.

But the tooling has evolved. High-Level Synthesis (HLS) allows engineers to describe hardware behavior using C++-like abstractions.

That said—this matters—HLS doesn’t replace hardware thinking. Strong FPGA engineers still need RTL intuition, timing awareness, and system-level understanding.

The barrier to entry is lower.
The depth—and the payoff—remain high.

Conclusion: Build the Engine, Not Just the App

FPGA engineers don’t chase trends.
They enable them.

They make AI real-time.
They make autonomy safe.
They make space, medical, and defense systems possible.

It’s not a stress-free career—but it replaces feature churn and hype cycles with deep, defensible engineering work that ages well.

If you’re starting out—or thinking of pivoting in 2026—don’t just follow the crowd toward the next AI wrapper startup.

Look underneath.

That’s where the real innovation is happening.

About Me

I’m a Firmware Lead Engineer working across deep-tech domains. Despite my title, I still consider myself a student of the craft—the hardware world moves too fast for anyone to know it all. This series is for students—and for the younger version of myself—who want a clearer picture of FPGA and hardware-centric careers.

If you’re interested in building the engines of the future, follow along.
Drop your questions in the comments—I’ll try to address them as best I can in upcoming posts, including how to start, what to learn first, and what most people get wrong.

Leave a comment