The argument between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House wasn’t just a diplomatic clash—it was a brutal unveiling of America’s ugliest foreign policy tactics. Trump’s bluntness tore through the pretense, exposing Zelensky as a puppet president, ensnared in a war he cannot win alone.

Donald Trump has never been one to mask his disdain for subtlety. His approach to diplomacy is a wrecking ball—swing first, ask questions later. In his dealings with Zelensky, this was on full display. The former U.S. president’s open contempt and transactional view of foreign aid laid bare an uncomfortable truth: American support came with strings attached, and those strings were suffocating. On the other side stood Zelensky, a leader whose defiant speeches may play well on Western news, but the reality is harsher—he’s a leader without real power, propped up by Western dollars and weapons.

Is Ukraine really a symbol of freedom, or just the latest stage for America’s proxy wars?

Rajdeep Sardesai and his ilk wasted no time painting Zelensky as a modern-day David against Goliath, conveniently ignoring the billions in U.S. military aid that keep this ‘hero’ standing. For these so-called journalists, truth is secondary to the thrill of taking cheap shots at Modi.

The hypocrisy of the Indian left is almost laughable. They scream about American imperialism at home while cheering for Zelensky—a man whose every move is bankrolled by Washington. Apparently, imperialism is only bad when it doesn’t fit their anti-Modi agenda.

The so-called ‘liberal’ media in India, from NDTV to The Wire, have made a business out of anti-Modi hysteria. But when it comes to questioning America’s role in Ukraine, their voices suddenly turn meek. Maybe it’s hard to criticize your Western idols when you’ve built your career parroting their lines.

According to the Indian left’s gospel, Modi’s nationalism is evil, but NATO’s expansionism is ‘defending democracy.’ Maybe it’s time they admit what everyone else sees—that their morality is just American exceptionalism with a different accent.

The irony is impossible to ignore. The same voices that decry Modi’s alleged authoritarianism have no problem backing a leader whose survival hinges entirely on Western weapons and dollars. It’s not about ideology; it’s about optics and seizing every chance to attack Modi’s nationalist vision by aligning with a symbol that fits the agenda.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s fate seems eerily similar to that of Pakistan during the Cold War—a pawn in a larger game, funded and armed by the West to fight a war it might not survive. From the moment the U.S. started pouring military aid into Ukraine back in 2014—long before Russia’s full-scale invasion—the script was set.

Just like Pakistan was used as a disposable pawn in the Cold War, Ukraine is now the West’s cannon fodder—armed to the teeth and set loose, with no regard for the inevitable fallout. For years, the U.S. and Europe dangled NATO membership in front of Ukraine, promising security while knowingly provoking Russia. The uncomfortable truth is that Ukraine is fast becoming the new Pakistan, and the U.S. is once again playing with fire, risking a catastrophe that could dwarf the chaos left behind in Afghanistan.

If history teaches anything, it’s that America never learns from its mistakes. The playbook used in Ukraine was perfected decades ago in Afghanistan.

The U.S. has mastered the art of fighting wars with other people’s blood. Ukraine might be the latest victim, but it won’t be the last. For Washington, it’s all a game—sacrifice pawns, move pieces, and leave the board in flames. The only question is: who’s the next disposable ally?

Thank you for reading!!

Also read:

• After Pakistan, Ukraine is the new playground for the US; here is how the future looks like..
• A tale of two conflicts and the hypocrisy!