In today’s social media circus, where every word can ignite a firestorm, Congress leader Shama Mohamed found herself in the eye of a storm with the Shama Mohamed Rohit Sharma controversy. Her comment calling Indian cricketer Rohit Sharma “fat” unleashed a vicious backlash—relentless online trolling and journalists storming her home, hungry for soundbites. It was a public shaming on steroids.

The Shama Mohamed-Rohit Sharma Controversy

The Shama Mohamed Rohit Sharma controversy erupted when Mohamed, a Congress spokesperson, made a casual remark about Sharma’s physique during a public event in early 2025. According to a report by The Times of India, she stated, “Rohit Sharma looks a bit fat these days, doesn’t he?”—a comment that, while tactless, wasn’t abusive or illegal. The reaction was swift: fans flooded platforms like X with outrage, branding her insensitive, while media outlets amplified the social media backlash. Sharma, for his part, chose not to respond directly, focusing instead on his preparation for upcoming matches, as noted in a recent ESPN cricinfo interview. But the damage was done—Mohamed became the target of a national uproar.

Let’s cut to the core: Doesn’t Shama Mohamed have the right to speak her mind? In a democracy that boasts about free speech, shouldn’t we tolerate voices that don’t toe the line, even if they’re provocative or petty? The mob’s response—and the media’s frenzy—lays bare a chilling truth: dissent, however minor, is increasingly met with disproportionate fury in Indian politics.

Congress’s Free Speech Hypocrisy

The real gut-punch comes from Congress’s betrayal in the Shama Mohamed Rohit Sharma controversy. This so-called champion of free speech didn’t just fail Mohamed—it threw her under the bus without a second thought. A party that loves to grandstand about liberty cowered when one of its own spoke out. On March 5, 2025, Congress issued a statement distancing itself, saying, “The views expressed by Shama Mohamed are her own and do not reflect the party’s stance,” as reported by NDTV. What does this say about Congress’s spine? Free speech, it seems, is only sacred when it fits their script.

The Congress’ political hypocrisy is glaring: the same party that zealously defends anti-India or anti-Hindu rhetoric under the free speech banner couldn’t muster the guts to stand by Mohamed. For instance, Congress vocally supported activist Kanhaiya Kumar’s 2016 JNU speech, despite its controversial nature, citing free expression. This isn’t just inconsistency—it’s a shameless double standard that reeks of political cowardice.

A Missed Opportunity to Challenge Intolerance

Worse, Congress fumbled a golden opportunity to strike a blow against the narrative of intolerance they’ve long pinned on Narendra Modi’s leadership. They’ve spent years branding Modi’s regime as a fascist force crushing dissent—yet here they are, joining the mob to silence their own. It’s a self-inflicted wound that exposes their intellectual bankruptcy. This isn’t just a missed chance; it’s a damning indictment of a party that’s lost its way, trading principles for political expediency. Why has Congress failed to address similar controversies consistently? Explore more on Congress’s history with free speech here (#).

The Decline of Congress’s Political Relevance

Indian voters aren’t blind. They see Congress for what it is: a hollow shell with no ideology, lurching from one opportunistic stunt to the next. Today, they distance themselves from Mohamed; tomorrow, they’d likely vilify Rohit Sharma if the winds of public opinion shifted. This isn’t leadership—it’s a desperate grab for relevance, and it’s failing miserably. A 2024 India Today survey found that 62% of respondents felt Congress lacked a clear vision, a sentiment this incident only reinforces.

Why Congress Failed:

  • Hypocrisy: Selective defense of free speech undermines their credibility.
  • Opportunism: Prioritizing optics over principles alienates voters.
  • Lack of Vision: Missing chances to champion real issues like intolerance.

If Congress keeps squandering moments like these, it’s digging its own grave. The party’s inability to stand on principle—starting with an unflinching defense of free speech, even when it stings—dooms it to irrelevance. Without a radical course correction, Congress isn’t just fighting for votes; it’s fighting for its very survival. And on this trajectory, it’s a battle they’re set to lose.

What do you think about Congress’s response to the Shama Mohamed Rohit Sharma controversy? Share your views in the comments below!

Also read:

Leave a comment